On-board HV systems · MCS megawatt charging

Electric Vehicles & Charging Infrastructure

On the vehicle side — HV junction box, cable terminations; on the infrastructure side — MCS 1500 A. One bimetal material for both.

The problem you need to solve

Two points in electric drivetrains cannot avoid the Al/Cu encounter. On the vehicle side: connecting the HV battery (Al laminate construction) to the traction inverter and OBC (Cu busbars) via the HV junction box, where every phase terminates in a bolted Al/Cu joint. The environment is –40 → +85 °C (UN ECE R100 Rev. 3), vibration, and 10 years continuous operation. On the infrastructure side: the CCS (250 A DC) and especially megawatt charging (MCS, 1500 A DC, IEC TS 61851-23-3 / SAE J3271) connector internal cable lugs see a Cu terminal pin meeting an Al conductor — even in liquid-cooled cables. Both points share long lifetime requirements (OEM: 10+ year warranty; public charger: 15+ years), zero-maintenance expectation.

How CUPAL solves it

CUPAL provides a solution from a single material for both vehicle and charging infrastructure sides. For the vehicle: transition between the HV junction box Al body and Cu bus, cable lug washer at the battery or inverter terminal. On the weight side: the same cross-section in pure copper would be ~49% heavier (Al/Cu density ratio); CUPAL's Cu layer is only 30% — every gram matters in the vehicle. On the connector side: the Al/Cu transition of the CCS/MCS connector internal cable lug can be sealed paste-free with a CUPAL washer; the connection passes IEC 61851 and IEC 62196 thermal and mechanical cycles with unchanged contact. The base material comes with material certificates required for UN ECE R100 and ISO 6469-3 electrical safety tests.

EV-specific parameters

400 → 1000V DC
Typical HV voltage range (next-gen MCS up to 1500 V)
1500A
MCS peak current (SAE J3271 / IEC TS 61851-23-3)
–40 / +85°C
UN ECE R100 Rev. 3 thermal cycle range
~49%
Weight saving vs. pure Cu at identical geometry

Where it's used — in the vehicle and the charger

Four specific points — two on the vehicle side, two in the infrastructure.

01 / 04

On-board HV junction box: battery Al body → Cu bus

The problem you need to solve. The battery pack is aluminium, the outgoing inverter busbar is copper. The HV junction box carries current across Al/Cu bolted joints. Continuous vibration + thermal cycling creeps the contact.

How CUPAL solves it. CUPAL transition washer or sheet at every HV junction box Al/Cu bolted joint. Al side towards the pack, Cu side towards the bus; the bimetal material seals the interface internally — no paste in the vehicle.

02 / 04

Motor controller connection: inverter Cu → motor winding

The problem you need to solve. The traction inverter starts from Cu busbars; in some systems an Al intermediate conductor is used for weight savings. Every Al/Cu joint deteriorates under thermal loads over 10 years.

How CUPAL solves it. CUPAL shim a few mm thick at the bolted joints. The HV system electrical safety (ISO 6469-3) can be directly tied to a tested component.

03 / 04

CCS charging cable connector interior

The problem you need to solve. Inside the CCS connector housing, there is a cable-lug-type bolted joint between the liquid-cooled Cu terminal pin and the external Al conductor. 250 A DC continuous + fretting from regular plug/unplug cycles.

How CUPAL solves it. CUPAL washer between the pin and the conductor. Paste-free, does not degrade thermal behaviour per IEC 62196-3, Al oxide cannot grow inside the bimetal interface.

04 / 04

Bus depot / fleet MCS charging point

The problem you need to solve. Fleet-site MCS charger (1–3 MW) draws current from multiple output cabinets; the MW-level Al busbar converges onto Cu breakers. Continuous 16–24 hour/day operation, downtime unacceptable.

How CUPAL solves it. Custom CUPAL transition segment between Al bus and Cu breaker terminal. Cut to site-specific geometry, for busbar systems per IEC 61439-7 charging station standard.

Compared to alternatives

EV decision matrix — weight on the vehicle side, service life on the infrastructure side.

SolutionBolted Al/Cu + paste
Contact over 10+ yearsDrifts, fretting present
MaintenanceAnnual service on public charger
Lead timeFrom stock
Lifetime cost / jointHigh (public charger: on-site downtime)
SolutionSpecial Al/Cu connector (OEM custom)
Contact over 10+ yearsStable
MaintenanceNone
Lead timeOEM program, long
Lifetime cost / jointHigh (OEM proprietary)
SolutionPure Cu (Al-free design)
Contact over 10+ yearsStable
MaintenanceNone
Lead timeStandard
Lifetime cost / jointHigh (vehicle weight + Cu price)
SolutionCUPAL custom cut
Contact over 10+ yearsStable
MaintenanceNone
Lead time2–4 weeks
Lifetime cost / jointLow, with weight saving

Common questions from OEM and charger manufacturer engineers

CUPAL base material comes with DIN 17007 / DIN 1787 Werkstoff identifiers (Al 99.5 / 3.0255 and E1-Cu58 / 2.0065). EN 10204 2.2 with every shipment, EN 10204 3.1 on request; ISO 9001:2015 certification has been maintained since 1991 within the group.
Yes — CUPAL material is not restrictive from a dielectric standpoint, as it is a conductor. The specific connector geometry is dimensioned by the charger manufacturer per IEC TS 61851-23-3 / SAE J3271 + IEC 62196-3; the CUPAL slice is cut to that.
Liquid cooling cools the cable and connector contacts. CUPAL's thermal conductivity at the bond interface is not a bottleneck — conductivity close to pure Cu applies at the contact surface. Geometry is agreed with the manufacturer.
Base material 500×2000 mm in 0.5–2.0 mm thickness from stock, thicker segments 3–10 mm range to order. For larger OEM volumes we work with framework agreements.
Standard sheet 1–3 business days within the EU. Custom cutting from DXF drawing 2–4 weeks. Rush projects by separate arrangement; manufacturing runs at HIDRA-MIX in Budapest.

Applicable standards for this field

UN ECE R100
ISO 6469-3
IEC 61851
IEC 62196
IEC 61439-7
ISO 17409

Get free expert advice

Cannot find your application? Describe it to us and we will advise.